Froome krijgt van organisatie startverbod in Tour de France'
https://www.nu.nl/wielrennen/5340320/fr ... rance.html
Het dopingtopic 2.0
-
i-mac
Dat deden ze in het verleden toch ook al? Tom Boonen kreeg ooit startverbod na zijn cocaïne toestand. En zo waren er nog. Alleen vraag ik me af of ze ook een Franse renner zouden straffen. Want het is algemeen geweten dat de ASO behoorlijk chauvinistisch is (zacht uitgedrukt).
Laatst gewijzigd door i-mac op 01 jul 2018 22:25, 1 keer totaal gewijzigd.
-
ridley orion
- Forum-lid
- Berichten: 594
- Lid geworden op: 12 aug 2011 20:33
Fijn van organisatie dat ze froome niet laten starten zeker als je na een half jaar nog naar smoesjes moet zoeken voor je te hoge waarden
Hoop dat dit verbod voor een rechter stand houd.
Sky ie wel kamioen procederen
Hoop dat dit verbod voor een rechter stand houd.
Sky ie wel kamioen procederen
-
ThijsvdnBerg
- Forum-lid
- Berichten: 206
- Lid geworden op: 11 feb 2014 13:19
https://www.ad.nl/tour-de-france/uci-st ... ~ad096ef9/
Ongekend wat hier gebeurd. Maanden getouwtrek en binnen maandagochtend is het opeens geregeld.
Ongekend wat hier gebeurd. Maanden getouwtrek en binnen maandagochtend is het opeens geregeld.
Zorro
02 jul 2018 11:34
Ha, ik zie het net binnenkomen op mijn NOS app.
En dan dadelijk dat ook nog met een stalen smoel op TV gaan toelichten zeker. Wat een zooitje.
En dan dadelijk dat ook nog met een stalen smoel op TV gaan toelichten zeker. Wat een zooitje.
Laatst gewijzigd door Zorro op 02 jul 2018 11:38, 1 keer totaal gewijzigd.
We thought that we had the answers
It was the questions we had wrong
U2-11 O'Clock Tick Tock
It was the questions we had wrong
U2-11 O'Clock Tick Tock
als ik het goed begrijp, mag iedereen met een attest nu onbeperkt salbutamol in zijn bloed hebben? Of enkel degenen met een skytruitje om het lijf?
PPfft, koers... vanavond dan maar naar het voetbal kijken ...
PPfft, koers... vanavond dan maar naar het voetbal kijken ...
Het is soms balanceren op een slappe koord maar ik heb toch graag het laatste woord. 
UCI statement on anti-doping proceedings involving Mr Christopher Froome
02 July 2018
The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) confirms that the anti-doping proceedings involving Mr Christopher Froome have now been closed.
On 20 September 2017, Mr Froome was notified that a sample collected during the Vuelta a España on 7 September 2017 was reported to contain a concentration of salbutamol in excess of 1000ng/ml.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Prohibited List provides that inhaled salbutamol is permitted subject to a maximum dose of 1600 micrograms over 24 hours, not to exceed 800 micrograms every 12 hours (the permitted use), and that a concentration in excess of 1000 ng/ml is an abnormal finding which is presumed not to be the result of a permitted use. The WADA Prohibited List further provides that the athlete can establish that his/her abnormal result was the consequence of a permitted use, in which case it will not be considered as an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF).
The UCI instigated disciplinary proceedings in accordance with the UCI Anti-Doping Rules (ADR), during which Mr Froome exercised his right to prove that his abnormal result was the consequence of a permitted use. The proceedings started with an evidentiary phase, with the UCI and Mr Froome agreeing that the UCI Anti-Doping Tribunal would decide whether certain information could be provided to Mr Froome in preparing his defence. The UCI already sought WADA’s advice at that stage, during which a significant number of expert and scientific reports were submitted on behalf of Mr Froome.
After the evidentiary phase, Mr Froome requested additional information from WADA about the salbutamol regime. Following receipt of information from WADA, Mr Froome then filed his explanation for the abnormal result on 4 June 2018, together with significant additional expert evidence.
The UCI has considered all the relevant evidence in detail (in consultation with its own experts and experts from WADA). On 28 June 2018, WADA informed the UCI that it would accept, based on the specific facts of the case, that Mr Froome’s sample results do not constitute an AAF. In light of WADA’s unparalleled access to information and authorship of the salbutamol regime, the UCI has decided, based on WADA’s position, to close the proceedings against Mr Froome.
Whilst the UCI would have obviously preferred the proceedings to have been finalised earlier in the season, it had to ensure that Mr Froome had a fair process, as it would have done with any other rider, and that the correct decision was issued. Having received WADA’s position on 28 June 2018, the UCI prepared and issued its formal reasoned decision as quickly as possible in the circumstances.
The UCI understands that there will be significant discussion of this decision, but wishes to reassure all those involved in or interested in cycling that its decision is based on expert opinions, WADA’s advice, and a full assessment of the facts of the case. The UCI hopes that the cycling world can now turn its focus to, and enjoy, the upcoming races on the cycling calendar.
02 July 2018
The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) confirms that the anti-doping proceedings involving Mr Christopher Froome have now been closed.
On 20 September 2017, Mr Froome was notified that a sample collected during the Vuelta a España on 7 September 2017 was reported to contain a concentration of salbutamol in excess of 1000ng/ml.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Prohibited List provides that inhaled salbutamol is permitted subject to a maximum dose of 1600 micrograms over 24 hours, not to exceed 800 micrograms every 12 hours (the permitted use), and that a concentration in excess of 1000 ng/ml is an abnormal finding which is presumed not to be the result of a permitted use. The WADA Prohibited List further provides that the athlete can establish that his/her abnormal result was the consequence of a permitted use, in which case it will not be considered as an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF).
The UCI instigated disciplinary proceedings in accordance with the UCI Anti-Doping Rules (ADR), during which Mr Froome exercised his right to prove that his abnormal result was the consequence of a permitted use. The proceedings started with an evidentiary phase, with the UCI and Mr Froome agreeing that the UCI Anti-Doping Tribunal would decide whether certain information could be provided to Mr Froome in preparing his defence. The UCI already sought WADA’s advice at that stage, during which a significant number of expert and scientific reports were submitted on behalf of Mr Froome.
After the evidentiary phase, Mr Froome requested additional information from WADA about the salbutamol regime. Following receipt of information from WADA, Mr Froome then filed his explanation for the abnormal result on 4 June 2018, together with significant additional expert evidence.
The UCI has considered all the relevant evidence in detail (in consultation with its own experts and experts from WADA). On 28 June 2018, WADA informed the UCI that it would accept, based on the specific facts of the case, that Mr Froome’s sample results do not constitute an AAF. In light of WADA’s unparalleled access to information and authorship of the salbutamol regime, the UCI has decided, based on WADA’s position, to close the proceedings against Mr Froome.
Whilst the UCI would have obviously preferred the proceedings to have been finalised earlier in the season, it had to ensure that Mr Froome had a fair process, as it would have done with any other rider, and that the correct decision was issued. Having received WADA’s position on 28 June 2018, the UCI prepared and issued its formal reasoned decision as quickly as possible in the circumstances.
The UCI understands that there will be significant discussion of this decision, but wishes to reassure all those involved in or interested in cycling that its decision is based on expert opinions, WADA’s advice, and a full assessment of the facts of the case. The UCI hopes that the cycling world can now turn its focus to, and enjoy, the upcoming races on the cycling calendar.
-
daniel1975
- Forum-lid HC
- Berichten: 37654
- Lid geworden op: 11 nov 2004 14:14
Ze kunnen zeggen dat de UCI een overhaaste beslissing heeft genomen, en deze onvoldoende heeft onderbouwd (wat misschien ook wel gewoon zo is), en dat daarom de deelname van Froome nog steeds niet goed is voor het imago van de Tour.
Maar goed, daarmee trekken ze de competentie van de UCI openlijk in twijfel, dus dat zullen ze ook niet willen riskeren.